Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Saturday, April 5, 2008
TENDER:-Consultancy services for planning, designing & commissioning for the proposed 2nd Runway & related infrastructure at Nagpur
Sub: Consultancy services for planning, designing & commissioning for the proposed 2nd Runway & related infrastructure at Nagpur – Pre-bid meeting held on 28/01/2008 at 2:30 p.m. at MADC Ltd., 12th floor, World Trade Centre - I, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai – 400 005
Clarifications to the queries with agreed deviations
During the meeting, various queries were raised by the participants, who had purchased the bid document and/or downloaded by some of them from the website of MADC. During the meeting, clarifications to the various queries raised and clarifications to them were offered by the Vice Chairman & Managing Director, MADC. The agreed deviations out of these clarifications are produced below for the information of the bidders, so that they can take these deviations into consideration and prepare their bid offer accordingly.
1. Scope of work:- The major query raised by most of the bidders was regarding the scope of work. Following clarifications were offered to them.
(a) The scope of consultancy services stipulated in the bid document includes the complete planning, designing and estimation, preparation of construction drawings, preparation of bid document, helping MADC in managing the bidding process, helping MADC in selection of the contractor by evaluating the various bids received till the award of work.
(b) The consultant so appointed, will have to visit the site atleast once in a month to satisfy various queries of the contractor and Project Management Consultant (PMC) from time to time as and when required regarding the drawings supplied by the consultants and any construction difficulty arose at that point of time. If any additional visit is required due to certain problem cropped up at the site other than the drawings (inadequate information or mismatching of certain dimensions, etc.) will be at the cost of MADC, which will be reimbursed separately, for which purpose, the bidders should clearly specify such cost per person depending upon the level of the person, which should include the travel expenses and stay at Nagpur only.
(c) The consultant so appointed, will not be required to work as a PMC during the construction phase. Therefore, they are not required to quote fees for PMC services.
(d) In reply to one query, it was clarified that the consultant so appointed shall not be debarred from participating in the bidding for PMC services for this job.
(e) Regarding the scope of services delineated in clause No. 4 of Terms of Reference (ToR) on Page No. 17 of bid document, the consultant will not be required to work on 3.9, ARFF and 3.10, Fuel Farm. Other provisions of scope of work shall remain unchanged. The consultant shall be required to plan the alignment of the fuel hydrant pipes and design proper crossings at the runways and taxiways.
(f) The consultant will not be required to plan and design any building whatsoever, except the one essential for operation of the runway.
(g) Connection between the taxiway and the parking apron will not be required to be planned or designed by the consultant. The consultant shall be required to plan and design such taxiway to the point of connection to parking apron.
(h) It was further clarified that the scope of consultancy services shall also include carrying out the requisite topographic survey, geotechnical investigation for planning and designing of the runways and taxiways and also to carry out obstruction limitation survey for identifying the objects coming in the flying zone of the runway and obstructing the flight path. The consultant shall be required to submit these survey details to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA)/ Airports Authority of India (AAI) and obtain approval of such competent authority for construction of this runway and taxiway. However, all such applications and recommendation letters, as prepared by the consultants, shall be submitted under the seal and signature of MADC.
2. Payment schedule:-
(a) Most of the participants requested for deducting 5% payment as against the deduction of 15% stipulated in the bid document, clause No. 8 of ToR on Page No. 19 & 20 of bid document:– This is not agreed as the consultants are required to diligently respond to the request of the client to attend the site for satisfying various queries and solving various problems related to drawings and construction method.
(b) In the payment schedule, at Serial No. 8, there is a typographical mistake. The bidders are requested to read it as follows:– “Consultation with MADC help in selecting contractor”.
3. Clause No. 11(b) ‘Instruction to Bidders’ on page no. 10:- It has been specified that “It is very important and pertinent to note that the bidder is required to quote separately for Part A, B and C of the project, as indicated in the Terms of Reference under Section 2.0”. The consultants are requested to note that there are no different parts of the consultancy services and therefore, they are not required to quote separately for each part.
Bidders are requested to quote a lumpsum price for the complete consultancy services stipulated under the bid document taking into consideration the agreed deviations in this letter and submit the financial proposal in the format given under Appendix 2 on page No. 57 of the bid document.
4. Participants asked about the time limit for construction phase. It was clarified that the consultants will have to estimate the completion time most reasonably while preparing the programme of the work. There is no specific time limit for construction phase.
5. Part I – Instruction to Bidders, clause E of Marking System on Page 12 of the bid document:– Participants asked about the concept design. The concept design should be only conceptual, giving the general idea of the system and innovative ideas, if any.
Clause E(vi) - Artistic design:- It clearly means that if the consultant has any innovative idea in planning and designing the runway, taxiway or any other services from its aesthetic point of view.
6. Access to the Master Plan and TEFS Report:- It was clarified that the consultant on their request will be allowed to see the Master Plan and TEFS Report prepared by M/s. L&T Ramboll. However, it will not entitle the consultants to claim regarding any modification, change in the design or accuracy from dimensional and other point of view of the Master Plan. The consultants are required to make their own layout and plan fitting into the provisions of the Master Plan. It was clarified that the Master Plan and the TEFS report will not be given to the consultants before bidding. After the consultant is selected, the complete document as and when required, shall be given to them for their reference to enable them to plan in accordance with the Master Plan.
7. Clause No. 3.2.4 of Contract Conditions, Section 3 on Page No. 30 of the bid document – Prohibition of conflicting activities:- It was clarified that the consultant selected for this assignment shall not be allowed to accept any consultancy with the contractors appointed by MADC or any airport within the region covering almost the area covered under the radius of about 500 Km. from MIHAN project.
8. Clause No. 2.7 of General Conditions of Contract on page No. 27 of the bid document:- Spelling of ‘Force Majeure’ be corrected wherever the word appears.
9. Total manpower deployment schedule for supervision during the project on page No. 51 should be treated as deleted.
10. Page 55 – Heading on the top, i.e. Quality control during the supervision of work by consultant as PMC should be treated as deleted. Other contents of this page shall remain unchanged.
11. Page 55 – Work Experience (Projects during last five years):- Consultant will have to give the details of the project related to the development of airport handled by them during the last 5 years. It was clarified that both, the letter of award of assignment and the completion certificate, must also be attached for each work mentioned in the given table.
12. Turnover during the last 3 years – Financial year ending 2005 to 2007 on page 55 of the bid document:- It was clarified that the bidders shall have to give the turnover related to airport works during the last 3 years. As far as total turnover of their company is concerned, they may give the Balance-sheet certified by the Chartered Accountant.
13. Composition of the proposed technical and support staff team on Page No. 50 of bid document :- In reply to the query, it was agreed that the bidders may not give the details of support staff like clerks, typists, computer operators, etc. under table 2 on page 50. However, details of the technical staff required to work on the assignment should be given in table 1 on page 50 of the bid document.
14. A query was raised regarding evaluation of the joint ventures. It was mentioned that the evaluation of each joint venture partner shall be done by MADC and on the basis of evaluation of all these partners, according to the area of participation of partners and sub-consultants as provided in the questionnaire about the information regarding the consultants/consortium members and sub-consultants given on page 44 and the cumulative marking will be given to the joint venture as a whole. It was further clarified that the MoU on suitable stamp papers of such joint venture partners and sub-consultants must be submitted along with the offer document.
15. Query regarding presentation to be made as per clause ‘E’ of marking system on page 12:– It was clarified that the concerned expert persons mentioned in the list of key personnel should be available during the presentation, so that the client is sure that they will be working on this project and also help in satisfying various queries raised by MADC during presentation.
16. Project team – Clause No. 9 of ToR on Page No. 21:- It was asked whether Instrumentation Engineer, Electrical Engineer and Mechanical Engineer are required to be appointed separately and if not shown in the offer, whether marks will be deducted for the same. It was informed by the client that all the 3 separate Engineers are not required for such job. It was clarified that the bidders should clearly mention that only one such person having the knowledge of instrumentation, electrical and mechanical works is adequate and the name of the same person should appear at 3 different places against each discipline.
17. Clause No. 18 of ToR on Page 22:- A query was raised regarding the duration for which the Engineer and Stenographer should be provided by the consultant to the client.
It is clarified that consultant shall be required to provide such staff and facilities to MADC till the completion of their consultancy services, i.e. till the work is awarded successfully.
18. To a query, it was clarified that the category of the runway and taxiway presently considered are Code 4F. However, as far as category IIIA or B or C needs to be decided taking into consideration ICAO norms for the world-class airport to enable any type of aircrafts to land and take-off as available in the world and with the best landing techniques.
19. To a query, it was clarified that the consultants have to plan and design for the various equipments and systems like approach lighting, runway lighting and any equipments required to make the runway operational by following the best norms provided by ICAO/DGCA.
20. Maintenance manual:- It was clarified that the consultant will have to prepare maintenance manual of all the civil work, systems and equipments and will be required to give the list of suppliers along with specifications of the equipments and systems that are required to be installed. They will have to include all such equipments and systems in the maintenance manual. In case, any equipment other than the specified one is required to be procured by the contractor, the details of the same will be given to the consultant separately.
21. Participants asked whether Nagpur airport will be used by military. Yes, it was clarified that Indian Air Force has an establishment there and will be using Nagpur airport, mainly the runway proposed to be constructed under this assignment.
22. It was further clarified that the entries from the taxiway to the various plots shall not be planned and designed by the consultant. Only the schematic geometrical drawing shall be given by the consultant for all such entries, which should be useful for the available aircrafts in the world.
23. Bidders asked as to how much time the Proof Consultant will take for approving the drawings and designs prepared by them. It was clarified that they will take maximum 15 days from the date of submission by the consultant, provided that the plans and designs are prepared in accordance with the norms and all the details are given to the Proof Consultant.
At the end of the meeting, all the participants requested that they need some more time for preparation of their offer and therefore, the date of submission be extended suitably. It was agreed that the date of submission of the completed bids is extended upto and including 29/02/2008. The time and place of submission will remain unchanged. Any bids received after this date and time shall not be considered.
The bidders are requested to take these clarifications into consideration while preparing their offer. These clarifications issued by MADC shall form part of the completed offer to be submitted by the bidders. All other provisions of the bid document shall remain unchanged. The bidders are requested to sign these clarifications and submit it along with the sealed offer in Envelope A.
(R.P. Yaul)
(General Manager)
Clarifications to the queries with agreed deviations
During the meeting, various queries were raised by the participants, who had purchased the bid document and/or downloaded by some of them from the website of MADC. During the meeting, clarifications to the various queries raised and clarifications to them were offered by the Vice Chairman & Managing Director, MADC. The agreed deviations out of these clarifications are produced below for the information of the bidders, so that they can take these deviations into consideration and prepare their bid offer accordingly.
1. Scope of work:- The major query raised by most of the bidders was regarding the scope of work. Following clarifications were offered to them.
(a) The scope of consultancy services stipulated in the bid document includes the complete planning, designing and estimation, preparation of construction drawings, preparation of bid document, helping MADC in managing the bidding process, helping MADC in selection of the contractor by evaluating the various bids received till the award of work.
(b) The consultant so appointed, will have to visit the site atleast once in a month to satisfy various queries of the contractor and Project Management Consultant (PMC) from time to time as and when required regarding the drawings supplied by the consultants and any construction difficulty arose at that point of time. If any additional visit is required due to certain problem cropped up at the site other than the drawings (inadequate information or mismatching of certain dimensions, etc.) will be at the cost of MADC, which will be reimbursed separately, for which purpose, the bidders should clearly specify such cost per person depending upon the level of the person, which should include the travel expenses and stay at Nagpur only.
(c) The consultant so appointed, will not be required to work as a PMC during the construction phase. Therefore, they are not required to quote fees for PMC services.
(d) In reply to one query, it was clarified that the consultant so appointed shall not be debarred from participating in the bidding for PMC services for this job.
(e) Regarding the scope of services delineated in clause No. 4 of Terms of Reference (ToR) on Page No. 17 of bid document, the consultant will not be required to work on 3.9, ARFF and 3.10, Fuel Farm. Other provisions of scope of work shall remain unchanged. The consultant shall be required to plan the alignment of the fuel hydrant pipes and design proper crossings at the runways and taxiways.
(f) The consultant will not be required to plan and design any building whatsoever, except the one essential for operation of the runway.
(g) Connection between the taxiway and the parking apron will not be required to be planned or designed by the consultant. The consultant shall be required to plan and design such taxiway to the point of connection to parking apron.
(h) It was further clarified that the scope of consultancy services shall also include carrying out the requisite topographic survey, geotechnical investigation for planning and designing of the runways and taxiways and also to carry out obstruction limitation survey for identifying the objects coming in the flying zone of the runway and obstructing the flight path. The consultant shall be required to submit these survey details to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA)/ Airports Authority of India (AAI) and obtain approval of such competent authority for construction of this runway and taxiway. However, all such applications and recommendation letters, as prepared by the consultants, shall be submitted under the seal and signature of MADC.
2. Payment schedule:-
(a) Most of the participants requested for deducting 5% payment as against the deduction of 15% stipulated in the bid document, clause No. 8 of ToR on Page No. 19 & 20 of bid document:– This is not agreed as the consultants are required to diligently respond to the request of the client to attend the site for satisfying various queries and solving various problems related to drawings and construction method.
(b) In the payment schedule, at Serial No. 8, there is a typographical mistake. The bidders are requested to read it as follows:– “Consultation with MADC help in selecting contractor”.
3. Clause No. 11(b) ‘Instruction to Bidders’ on page no. 10:- It has been specified that “It is very important and pertinent to note that the bidder is required to quote separately for Part A, B and C of the project, as indicated in the Terms of Reference under Section 2.0”. The consultants are requested to note that there are no different parts of the consultancy services and therefore, they are not required to quote separately for each part.
Bidders are requested to quote a lumpsum price for the complete consultancy services stipulated under the bid document taking into consideration the agreed deviations in this letter and submit the financial proposal in the format given under Appendix 2 on page No. 57 of the bid document.
4. Participants asked about the time limit for construction phase. It was clarified that the consultants will have to estimate the completion time most reasonably while preparing the programme of the work. There is no specific time limit for construction phase.
5. Part I – Instruction to Bidders, clause E of Marking System on Page 12 of the bid document:– Participants asked about the concept design. The concept design should be only conceptual, giving the general idea of the system and innovative ideas, if any.
Clause E(vi) - Artistic design:- It clearly means that if the consultant has any innovative idea in planning and designing the runway, taxiway or any other services from its aesthetic point of view.
6. Access to the Master Plan and TEFS Report:- It was clarified that the consultant on their request will be allowed to see the Master Plan and TEFS Report prepared by M/s. L&T Ramboll. However, it will not entitle the consultants to claim regarding any modification, change in the design or accuracy from dimensional and other point of view of the Master Plan. The consultants are required to make their own layout and plan fitting into the provisions of the Master Plan. It was clarified that the Master Plan and the TEFS report will not be given to the consultants before bidding. After the consultant is selected, the complete document as and when required, shall be given to them for their reference to enable them to plan in accordance with the Master Plan.
7. Clause No. 3.2.4 of Contract Conditions, Section 3 on Page No. 30 of the bid document – Prohibition of conflicting activities:- It was clarified that the consultant selected for this assignment shall not be allowed to accept any consultancy with the contractors appointed by MADC or any airport within the region covering almost the area covered under the radius of about 500 Km. from MIHAN project.
8. Clause No. 2.7 of General Conditions of Contract on page No. 27 of the bid document:- Spelling of ‘Force Majeure’ be corrected wherever the word appears.
9. Total manpower deployment schedule for supervision during the project on page No. 51 should be treated as deleted.
10. Page 55 – Heading on the top, i.e. Quality control during the supervision of work by consultant as PMC should be treated as deleted. Other contents of this page shall remain unchanged.
11. Page 55 – Work Experience (Projects during last five years):- Consultant will have to give the details of the project related to the development of airport handled by them during the last 5 years. It was clarified that both, the letter of award of assignment and the completion certificate, must also be attached for each work mentioned in the given table.
12. Turnover during the last 3 years – Financial year ending 2005 to 2007 on page 55 of the bid document:- It was clarified that the bidders shall have to give the turnover related to airport works during the last 3 years. As far as total turnover of their company is concerned, they may give the Balance-sheet certified by the Chartered Accountant.
13. Composition of the proposed technical and support staff team on Page No. 50 of bid document :- In reply to the query, it was agreed that the bidders may not give the details of support staff like clerks, typists, computer operators, etc. under table 2 on page 50. However, details of the technical staff required to work on the assignment should be given in table 1 on page 50 of the bid document.
14. A query was raised regarding evaluation of the joint ventures. It was mentioned that the evaluation of each joint venture partner shall be done by MADC and on the basis of evaluation of all these partners, according to the area of participation of partners and sub-consultants as provided in the questionnaire about the information regarding the consultants/consortium members and sub-consultants given on page 44 and the cumulative marking will be given to the joint venture as a whole. It was further clarified that the MoU on suitable stamp papers of such joint venture partners and sub-consultants must be submitted along with the offer document.
15. Query regarding presentation to be made as per clause ‘E’ of marking system on page 12:– It was clarified that the concerned expert persons mentioned in the list of key personnel should be available during the presentation, so that the client is sure that they will be working on this project and also help in satisfying various queries raised by MADC during presentation.
16. Project team – Clause No. 9 of ToR on Page No. 21:- It was asked whether Instrumentation Engineer, Electrical Engineer and Mechanical Engineer are required to be appointed separately and if not shown in the offer, whether marks will be deducted for the same. It was informed by the client that all the 3 separate Engineers are not required for such job. It was clarified that the bidders should clearly mention that only one such person having the knowledge of instrumentation, electrical and mechanical works is adequate and the name of the same person should appear at 3 different places against each discipline.
17. Clause No. 18 of ToR on Page 22:- A query was raised regarding the duration for which the Engineer and Stenographer should be provided by the consultant to the client.
It is clarified that consultant shall be required to provide such staff and facilities to MADC till the completion of their consultancy services, i.e. till the work is awarded successfully.
18. To a query, it was clarified that the category of the runway and taxiway presently considered are Code 4F. However, as far as category IIIA or B or C needs to be decided taking into consideration ICAO norms for the world-class airport to enable any type of aircrafts to land and take-off as available in the world and with the best landing techniques.
19. To a query, it was clarified that the consultants have to plan and design for the various equipments and systems like approach lighting, runway lighting and any equipments required to make the runway operational by following the best norms provided by ICAO/DGCA.
20. Maintenance manual:- It was clarified that the consultant will have to prepare maintenance manual of all the civil work, systems and equipments and will be required to give the list of suppliers along with specifications of the equipments and systems that are required to be installed. They will have to include all such equipments and systems in the maintenance manual. In case, any equipment other than the specified one is required to be procured by the contractor, the details of the same will be given to the consultant separately.
21. Participants asked whether Nagpur airport will be used by military. Yes, it was clarified that Indian Air Force has an establishment there and will be using Nagpur airport, mainly the runway proposed to be constructed under this assignment.
22. It was further clarified that the entries from the taxiway to the various plots shall not be planned and designed by the consultant. Only the schematic geometrical drawing shall be given by the consultant for all such entries, which should be useful for the available aircrafts in the world.
23. Bidders asked as to how much time the Proof Consultant will take for approving the drawings and designs prepared by them. It was clarified that they will take maximum 15 days from the date of submission by the consultant, provided that the plans and designs are prepared in accordance with the norms and all the details are given to the Proof Consultant.
At the end of the meeting, all the participants requested that they need some more time for preparation of their offer and therefore, the date of submission be extended suitably. It was agreed that the date of submission of the completed bids is extended upto and including 29/02/2008. The time and place of submission will remain unchanged. Any bids received after this date and time shall not be considered.
The bidders are requested to take these clarifications into consideration while preparing their offer. These clarifications issued by MADC shall form part of the completed offer to be submitted by the bidders. All other provisions of the bid document shall remain unchanged. The bidders are requested to sign these clarifications and submit it along with the sealed offer in Envelope A.
(R.P. Yaul)
(General Manager)
TENDER:-Design of LOGO for Nagpur Mass Transport Company Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur
Sub: Design of LOGO for Nagpur Mass Transport Company Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur.
The Maharashtra Airport Development Co. Ltd. (MADC) is developing Multi-model International Hub Project (MIHAN) at Nagpur. This Project includes the following:
1. International/National Cargo/passenger Complex at Nagpur Airport
2. SEZ at Nagpur
3. Road Terminal for domestic cargo at Nagpur
4. Rail Terminal for domestic Cargo at Nagpur
MADC have now decided to set up Mass Rapid Transport System at Nagpur. This will be done through Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) to be floated specially for this purpose with MADC as Lead Partner and Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (MIDC), Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) and Nagpur Improvement; Trust (NIT), as Equity Partners and some equity of Private Investors, preferably from Nagpur. The process of registering the SPV is at advanced stage and the name of the new Company has been approved by the Registrar of Companies as follows:
“NAGPUR MASS ATRANSPORT CO. PVT. LTD.”
We are in the process of preparing detailed feasibility report after following due procedure. In the meanwhile, we are interested in developing a LOGO and suitable stationery for the above purpose.
We thought that we would involve the students, ex-students of Art/Architectural colleges in Nagpur and all other residents of Nagpur in this process. We would therefore invite proposal from them before 31.3.08 for the following:
1. Logo for the company
2. Design of stationery and envelope for Company
3. Design of Stationery and envelope for Vice Chairman-cum-Managing Director.
Guidelines for this purpose are as follow. : All are requested to send their proposals at the following address:
Mr. Manoj Dandare, E.E., Mobile: No.9833627498
Maharashtara Airport Development Co. Ltd,
Bungalow No.41/2, Anand Nagar, Ramgiri Road,
Van Bhavan, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 001
Tel. No.0712-2527971/72, Fax: 0712 2552387
The Maharashtra Airport Development Co. Ltd. (MADC) is developing Multi-model International Hub Project (MIHAN) at Nagpur. This Project includes the following:
1. International/National Cargo/passenger Complex at Nagpur Airport
2. SEZ at Nagpur
3. Road Terminal for domestic cargo at Nagpur
4. Rail Terminal for domestic Cargo at Nagpur
MADC have now decided to set up Mass Rapid Transport System at Nagpur. This will be done through Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) to be floated specially for this purpose with MADC as Lead Partner and Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (MIDC), Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) and Nagpur Improvement; Trust (NIT), as Equity Partners and some equity of Private Investors, preferably from Nagpur. The process of registering the SPV is at advanced stage and the name of the new Company has been approved by the Registrar of Companies as follows:
“NAGPUR MASS ATRANSPORT CO. PVT. LTD.”
We are in the process of preparing detailed feasibility report after following due procedure. In the meanwhile, we are interested in developing a LOGO and suitable stationery for the above purpose.
We thought that we would involve the students, ex-students of Art/Architectural colleges in Nagpur and all other residents of Nagpur in this process. We would therefore invite proposal from them before 31.3.08 for the following:
1. Logo for the company
2. Design of stationery and envelope for Company
3. Design of Stationery and envelope for Vice Chairman-cum-Managing Director.
Guidelines for this purpose are as follow. : All are requested to send their proposals at the following address:
Mr. Manoj Dandare, E.E., Mobile: No.9833627498
Maharashtara Airport Development Co. Ltd,
Bungalow No.41/2, Anand Nagar, Ramgiri Road,
Van Bhavan, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 001
Tel. No.0712-2527971/72, Fax: 0712 2552387
MADC
Maharashtra Airport Development Company Limited (MADC), constituted in the year 2002 by the Government of Maharashtra (GoM) as a Special Purpose Company. MADC was jointly formed with equity participation from City and Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. (CIDCO), Nagpur Improvement Trust (NIT), Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC), Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MSRDC) and later Nagpur Municipal Corporation to join in equity.
MADC has been formed to play a lead role in the planning and implementation of the Multi-modal International Hub Airport at Nagpur (MIHAN) project, keeping in mind the key objectives. The Government of Maharashtra has taken the initiative of setting up a world class Multi-modal International Hub Airport at Nagpur. MADC would also take up development of other Airports in Maharashtra not belonging to the Airports Authority of India (AAI) and Indian Air Force (IAF) which will provide air connectivity between various important district Head Quarters and the Capital of the State
Integrated with the development of MIHAN, the master plan of the project consist of a Special Economic Zone comprising of an Information Technology City, Health City, a Captive Power Plant and other Manufacturing and Value Added units.
The project will be supported with world-class infrastructure to make it an ideal place for international operations.
MADC's Capital Standing:
• AUTHORISED CAPITAL : Rs. 400 Million (US $ 9 Million)
• SUBSCRIBED CAPITAL : Rs. 150.5 Million (US $ 3.4 Million)
• FUNDS PROVIDED BY
GOVT. OF MAHARASHTRA : Rs.1000 Million
Banks which have Sanctioned Term Loan for the MIHAN Project :
• Vijaya Bank (Lead Bank) : Rs. 1000 Million
• Punjab National Bank : Rs. 700 Million
• Bank of Maharashtra : Rs. 400 Million
• Bank of India : Rs. 450 Million
• Oriental Bank of Commerce : Rs. 450 Million
TOTAL : Rs. 3000 Million
Maharashtra Airport Development Co. Ltd. has a capital of Rs. 4000 Million
MADC has been formed to play a lead role in the planning and implementation of the Multi-modal International Hub Airport at Nagpur (MIHAN) project, keeping in mind the key objectives. The Government of Maharashtra has taken the initiative of setting up a world class Multi-modal International Hub Airport at Nagpur. MADC would also take up development of other Airports in Maharashtra not belonging to the Airports Authority of India (AAI) and Indian Air Force (IAF) which will provide air connectivity between various important district Head Quarters and the Capital of the State
Integrated with the development of MIHAN, the master plan of the project consist of a Special Economic Zone comprising of an Information Technology City, Health City, a Captive Power Plant and other Manufacturing and Value Added units.
The project will be supported with world-class infrastructure to make it an ideal place for international operations.
MADC's Capital Standing:
• AUTHORISED CAPITAL : Rs. 400 Million (US $ 9 Million)
• SUBSCRIBED CAPITAL : Rs. 150.5 Million (US $ 3.4 Million)
• FUNDS PROVIDED BY
GOVT. OF MAHARASHTRA : Rs.1000 Million
Banks which have Sanctioned Term Loan for the MIHAN Project :
• Vijaya Bank (Lead Bank) : Rs. 1000 Million
• Punjab National Bank : Rs. 700 Million
• Bank of Maharashtra : Rs. 400 Million
• Bank of India : Rs. 450 Million
• Oriental Bank of Commerce : Rs. 450 Million
TOTAL : Rs. 3000 Million
Maharashtra Airport Development Co. Ltd. has a capital of Rs. 4000 Million
intarnational hub airport MIHAN
To meet the increase in demand of air traffic in India and provide the required world-class infrastructure for the aviation sector the Govt. of Maharashtra along with the Ministry of Civil Aviation, Govt. of India has taken the step of developing the existing airport at Nagpur to international Standards.
Nagpur Airport has strategic location on the International Aviation Route
Nagpur Airport has a strategic location on the International Aviation Route
An existing Airport in the geographical center of India is spread over an area of about 400 Hectares
To be developed as an International Hub Airport for Passenger and Cargo to be extended over an area of 1278 Hectares
The Techno-Economic Feasibility Study (TEFS) of the Airport was conducted by a group of International Consultants lead by M/s. L&T Ramboll Consulting Engineers Ltd.
Existing Runway of 3200 x 45 meters is to be extended to 4000 x 60 meters to meet International Aviation Standards.
Provision for Additional parallel Runway of 4000 x 60 meters in future.
Airport Terminal Building; a semi-circular terminal building of 3 Million Sq. Ft. is to be developed in phases.
Ultimate Space for parking 50 Aircrafts in the terminal and 50 Aircrafts remote.
Provision for Aircraft Engineering and Maintenance facilities (MRO on about 100 Hectares).
An Exclusive Cargo Complex
The Most conductive Weather Dynamics for an Airport.
Projected Passenger Traffic of 14 Million and Cargo Traffic of 0.87Million Tones per year.
Project details
The project consists of widening and extending the present runway to international standards (4000 x 60 m) with a provision for a similar runway in the future.
The airport will have parking space for 50 aircraft at any time with 50 additional bays at fringe areas. The estimated cost of the project is 2500 crores covering a total area of 40.25 km² on the southern end of the city.
The Maharashtra State Government formed a special purpose entity in the name of Maharashtra Airport Development Company (MADC) for development of MIHAN and Singapore Changi Airport have been selected as the consultants for the project.
The airport will have parking space for 50 aircraft at any time with 50 additional bays at fringe areas. The estimated cost of the project is 2500 crores covering a total area of 40.25 km² on the southern end of the city.
The Maharashtra State Government formed a special purpose entity in the name of Maharashtra Airport Development Company (MADC) for development of MIHAN and Singapore Changi Airport have been selected as the consultants for the project.
Multi-modal International Cargo Hub and Airport at Nagpur
Multi-modal International Cargo Hub and Airport at Nagpur or MIHAN is an airport project for Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport, Nagpur. The project aims to exploit the central location of Nagpur and convert the present airport into a major freight hub with integrated road and rail connectivity along with a Special Economic Zone.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
